Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Defining the Position of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy in the Treatment Landscape of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Targeted Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In recent years, theranostics has become a promising approach for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), with trials investigating targeted radioligand therapy, particularly using prostate-specific membrane antigen labeled with lutetium-177 ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA). The proper position of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA in the therapeutic algorithm of mCRPC is yet to be identified.

Design, Setting, and Participants

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II/III randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA in treating mCRPC. Study endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), prostate-specific antigen-PFS, objective response rate, and overall survival.

Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis

Data were extracted according to the PRISMA statement. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects models. Statistical analyses were performed with RevMan software (v.5.2.3).

Results

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA reduced the risk of rPFS (HR 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–0.71; p < 0.00001) and prostate-specific antigen-PFS (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.41–0.67; p < 0.00001), and improved the objective response rate compared with control therapies (response rate 3.55; 95% CI 1.91–6.60; p < 0.0001), whereas no significant cumulative effect on overall survival was documented (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.65–1.31; p = 0.63). Notably, in a dedicated subanalysis, comparable effects on rPFS were observed when [177Lu]Lu-PSMA was compared with active therapy.

Conclusion

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA has a favorable impact on the radiographic and biochemical control of mCRPC and represents a potential treatment in a scenario where other valuable options are available. Further efforts are required to identify clinical and molecular markers necessary for proper patient stratification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Bauckneht M, Ciccarese C, Laudicella R, et al. Theranostics revolution in prostate cancer: basics, clinical applications, open issues and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev. 2024;124: 102698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102698.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hofman MS, Violet J, Hicks RJ, et al. [177Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet. 2018;19(6):825–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30198-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sartor O, De Bono J, Chi KN, et al. Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Eng J Med. 2021;385:1091–103. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sartor O, Castellano Gauna DE, Herrmann K, et al. Phase III trial of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in taxane-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PSMAfore). Ann Oncol. 2023;34(suppl_2):S1281–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-7534(23)04149-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sartor O, Jiang DM, Smoragiewicz M, et al. Efficacy of 177Lu-PNT2002 in PSMA-positive mCRPC following progression on an androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) (SPLASH). Ann Oncol. 2024;35(suppl_2):1–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/annonc/annonc1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, et al. 177Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10276):797–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00237-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, et al. Overall survival with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): secondary outcomes of a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2024;25(1):99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00529-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosar F, Dewes S, Ries M, et al. New insights in the paradigm of upregulation of tumoral PSMA expression by androgen receptor blockade: enzalutamide induces PSMA upregulation in castration-resistant prostate cancer even in patients having previously progressed on enzalutamide. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:687–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04674-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Emmett L, Subramaniam S, Crumbaker M, et al. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ENZA-p): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25(5):563–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00135-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scher HI, Morris MJ, Stadler WM, et al. Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: updated recommendations from the prostate cancer clinical trials working Group 3. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(12):1402–18. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. 2014. http://ims.cochrane.org/revman/download.

  17. Iacovelli R, Ciccarese C, Schinzari G, et al. Going towards a precise definition of the therapeutic management of de-novo metastatic castration sensitiveprostate cancer patients: how prognostic classification impact treatment decisions. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019;139:83–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.05.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ciccarese C, Iacovelli R, Sternberg CN, Gillessen S, Tortora G, Fizazi K. Triplet therapy with androgen deprivation, docetaxel, and androgen receptor signalling inhibitors in metastatic castration-sensitiveprostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2022;173:276–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fizazi K, Gillessen S, ESMO Guidelines Committee. Updated treatment recommendations for prostate cancer from the ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline considering treatment intensification and use of novel systemic agents. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(6):557–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.02.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Flippot R, Telli T, Velev M, et al. Activity of Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen and determinants of outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with cabazitaxel: the PACAP study. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024;7(5):1132–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.03.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. De Wit R, De Bono J, Cora N, et al. Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2506–18. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fizazi K, Piulats JM, Reaume MN, et al. Rucaparib or physician’s choice in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(8):719–32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2214676.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hussain M, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al. Survival with olaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(24):2345–57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2022485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Wambeke S, Vera-Badillo FE, Gyawali B. Controlling the control arm in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer trials: best standard of care or the minimum standard of care? J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(14):1518–21. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maines F, Caffo O, Veccia A, et al. Sequencing new agents after docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;96(3):498–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.07.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Azad AA, Bressel M, Tan H, et al. Sequential [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (UpFrontPSMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25(10):1267–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00440-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Seifert R, Telli T, Lapa C, et al. Safety and efficacy of extended therapy with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA: a German Multicenter Study. J Nucl Med. 2024;65(6):909–16. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Bauckneht.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No external funding was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Chiara Ciccarese has received speaker honoraria from Astellas, BMS, EISAI, IPSEN, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Matteo Bauckneht has received speaker honoraria from Novartis and GE Healthcare. Giampaolo Tortora is an advisory board member for BMS and Novartis. Luca Zagaria has received speaker honoraria from Novartis. Orazio Caffo has received speaker honoraria from Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Janssen, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Recordati. Roberto Iacovelli is an advisory board member for Astellas, BMS, EISAI, IPSEN, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi and a consultant for Astellas, EISAI, MSD, and Pfizer. Giuseppe Fornarini, Viria Beccia, Francesco Lanfranchi, Germano Perotti, Giada Pinterpe, Fortuna Migliaccio, Lucia Leccisotti, Gianmario Sambuceti, and Alessandro Giordano declare that they have no conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

Conceptualization: C.C., M.B., and R.I. Data curation: L.Z., G.F., V.B., F.L., G.P., G.P., F.M., G.T., L.L., G.S., A.G., and O.C. Formal analysis: C.C., M.B., and R.I. Investigation: C.C., and M.B. Methodology: all authors. Software: C.C. and R.I. Writing - original draft: C.C., M.B., and R.I. Writing - review & editing: all authors.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 148 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ciccarese, C., Bauckneht, M., Zagaria, L. et al. Defining the Position of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy in the Treatment Landscape of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials. Targ Oncol 20, 103–112 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01117-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01117-1

Profiles

  1. Matteo Bauckneht
  2. Francesco Lanfranchi